I'll be frank: I can write argumentative essays, hard-hitting exposés, dystopian fiction, creative nonfiction…but poetry eludes me. I am expected to put my entire message, filled with emotional nuances and flourishing detail, into three stanzas? But surely you jest. I can hardly capture what I want to say in ten pages, let alone ten phrases.
Poetry requires more
than a skilled pen: you are changing the tone
by where you direct the reader's eye on the page,
creating a new feel by how
s t a c c a t o or how
fluid you make the spacing.
You
can
create
drama
by
forming
pictures
with
the
words,
or theatrical
emphasis by how you arrange
each
sentence.
What I, as a prose writer, would explicitly state, a poet would shape and hint at through obscure imagery and subtle formatting. This is why I hate it. Not reading it, before any of you take offense: just writing it. I need the ability to blurt out what I have to say: I cannot veil it with surreality--hell, the mere thought makes my head spin. Poets must tell entire novels--people's portraits, histories of nations--in only so much space as could be fit on both my forearms. It takes more imagination than I possess. And so, when I hear, as I have many times, that as a writer I am an artist, I must disagree. A prose writer tells a story, one that appeals to the subconscious and rolls off the tongue as it is retold; a poet truly paints with words, and that, as a talent which I cannot fathom, I admire all the more.
No comments:
Post a Comment